| The
Medical House PLC
Preliminary results for the year ended 30 June 2005
The Medical House PLC ("TMH"), (AIM: MLH) the orthopaedic
devices and drug delivery company, announces its preliminary results
for the year ended 30 June 2005.
- Orthopaedic Instruments
- Profit up 75% at £1.24m (2004 : £0.7m)
- Sales up 57% at £8.6m (2004 : £5.47m)
- Strong growth throughout year
- Innovation in design and manufacture -key strengths
- Delay in FDA approval for key customer dampens immediate prospects
- Drug Delivery Systems
- Loss down to £363,000 (2004 : £411,000)
- Sales up 260% at £440,000 (2004 : £122,000)
- Deals with three pharma companies to drive sales in calendar year 2006
- Needle-free and automated needle products - well-received advanced
technology
- Financial Performance
- Group turnover £9.05m (2004 : £5.59m)
- Group operating profit (loss) £0.13m (2004 : £(2.18)m)
- Prospects
- Profit expected in 2006/7
- Short term trading held back by delay to FDA approval
Ian Townsend, Chairman, The Medical House, said:
"It is a pity that the edge has been taken off such a successful
year for both our divisions. The company has come a long way in
the past 12 months, although unfortunately the delay to FDA approval
for one of our key customers has deferred the financial rewards
of some of our endeavours. However with agreements in place for
the Drug Delivery division progressing to plan and with growth
in the Orthopaedic division in line with industry projections,
2006/7 should show a useful profit."
For further information:
The Medical House PLC tel: 0114 261 9011
Ian Townsend, Chairman www.themedicalhouse.com
Buchanan Communications tel: 020 7466 5000
Tim Anderson / Rebecca Skye Dietrich /Lisa Baderoon
Chairman's Statement
The year to 30 June 2005 has been one of yet further progress.
Our Orthopaedic division reported a record year, achieving its
highest-ever sales and operating profits, with our Drug Delivery
division making considerable strides forward in what is a significant
and challenging global market.
Eurocut Ltd
Orthopaedic Division 2005 Profit £1.24m (2004: £0.7m)
Eurocut’s improved first half sales continued in the second
half, resulting in a record year for both revenues and operating
profits. The majority of growth came from sales to one major customer
for a new system which has been very well received in their market.
Unfortunately, as we announced in August, approval for this product
by the US regulator (FDA) has been delayed which resulted in a
dip in orders. The effects of this will be felt in the first half
of 2005/6, but this should not be allowed to detract from the
excellent performance in 2004/5. Even if we were much larger with
a wider range of customers placing large volumes of business with
us, such a situation would still have a significant detrimental
effect on sales and earnings as it inevitably takes time to replace
work, and re-build the order book. Further the work which is more
readily available tends to be at lower margins and may not be
of the optimum mix to fully utilise all of our available production
facilities.
In order to mitigate the effects of any recurrence of such a
situation, Eurocut is seeking to enter into more Vendor Managed
Inventory (VMI) partnerships, enabling instruments to be made
for stock, based upon customers’ forward commitments, which
provides the combined advantages of rapid product availability
and short lead times for customers, as well as improved manufacturing
efficiencies at Eurocut. We already supply DePuy (a subsidiary
of Johnson and Johnson) with their new image-guided knee system
instrumentation on such a VMI arrangement and we are actively
working to expand this approach with other key customers in the
coming year. Another feature of VMI agreements is that they do
have a short-term impact on working capital as instruments are
initially made for stock and invoiced to the customer as they
are called off.
We have a tremendous asset in our capability to design and manufacture
innovative solutions for the orthopaedic market, but in the past
this has always been on a subcontract basis for our customers.
By developing concepts and technologies in which the intellectual
property is owned by Eurocut, we not only give ourselves the opportunity
to create new revenue streams but we also greatly add to the value
of our business.
I am pleased to reveal that during the past year we developed
a colour coding process for all sized instruments, assisting surgeons
by simplifying the selection of the appropriate instrument during
a surgical procedure. This process enables the embedding of coloured
polymers within these instruments to indicate instrument size,
with the coloured polymer remaining intact throughout repeated
cleaning and sterilisation of the instrument. Such colour coding
is already attracting considerable interest from our customers
and we are progressing regulatory approval with a major customer.
Although sales are unlikely to be generated from this colour coding
system before 2006/7, this will meet a considerable market need
and represents a significant opportunity. This is a good example
of an area in which Eurocut can generate a great deal of future
sales, as orthopaedic companies continually seek innovative ideas
and solutions to differentiate themselves from their competitors.
The opportunity for growth at Eurocut is as good as ever and
with recent investment in capital equipment we are confident of
increasing sales significantly, without the need for any major
additional capital expenditure. The company currently has a day
shift and smaller night shift, which represents considerable scope
for revenue growth by improving machine utilisation and increasing
manufacturing capacity.
The current order book is below the corresponding level of last
year, primarily because of the delay in FDA approval on one of
our major production items as announced in August. However, this
situation will reverse in due course as this particular customer
places more orders to replenish its stocks and as additional new
business is won from elsewhere. The likelihood is that the year
just started will now be a challenging period rather than one
of continued growth which we would have experienced had this customer’s
US regulatory approval not been delayed. Finally, I would like
to thank our Eurocut employees for their hard work during what
still has been an excellent year, despite the recent disappointment.
Medical House Products Ltd
Drug Delivery Division 2005 Loss £363,000 (2004: Loss £411,000)
Our Drug Delivery division made some major steps forward in the
past year which will result in significant sales in 2006 and beyond.
Revenues grew strongly to £440,000 (2004: £122,000)
as a result of improved device sales coupled with development
fees received from our customers and licensees. Although this
growth is encouraging, our revenues are still relatively small
in relation to the overall global drug delivery market in which
we are operating. We fully anticipate that sales will move ahead
strongly during the calendar year 2006 as we commence supplies
of devices and consumables to three pharmaceutical companies with
whom we have signed development, license and supply agreements.
These include Serono and BioPartners, both of whom will be supplied
with needle-free devices for injection of their respective human
growth hormone (hGH) products. Additionally, in 2006 we will commence
sales to our as-yet undisclosed pharmaceutical company partner
for the ASI disposable autoinjector.
At this point it is perhaps worth expanding on our future strategy
for further growth, in order that shareholders can better appreciate
the potential which exists in the global drug delivery market
for this division.
Firstly, there is the needle-free injector market which although
attractive, is undoubtedly a difficult market in which to achieve
rapid growth since it is represents a significant change to traditional,
needle-based injections. It is also worth noting that only a relatively
small number of injectable drugs are currently regarded suitable
for needle-free injections, with the major candidates being insulin,
human growth hormone and local anaesthetics.
Despite the fact that fewer patients (typically children) receive
human growth hormone than insulin, the hGH market is more developed
than the market for needle-free injection of insulin. This relates
to the fact that pharmaceutical companies such as Serono are prepared
to spend more time and resource supporting needle-free injection
of their hGH, which has a higher cost than insulin. The overall
market for insulin is much bigger, but is dominated by companies
which promote needle-based pen injectors on the basis of user-convenience,
although needle-free systems have a number of major advantages
in avoiding needlestick injury risks and need for sharps disposals,
as well as helping patients to overcome anxieties associated with
needles. Nevertheless we continue to pursue sales in the insulin
market through a number of distributors, which are in the process
of obtaining local regulatory approvals. Our own experience in
the UK, however, indicates that even when the product is provided
free-of-charge, a significant cultural shift is needed to generate
a major movement away from needle-based systems.
Consequently, although we will be assisting our distributors
in every way we can it would be imprudent to expect too much too
soon from them. The new SQ-PEN needle-free insulin injector has
passed all relevant European regulatory approvals (including NHS
Drug Tariff approval) and will be launched in the UK in December
2005, replacing the mhi-500 which will be withdrawn at the end
of this calendar year. It is worth emphasising that the credibility
engendered by these insulin delivery devices has probably surpassed
their sales value and that this credibility has brought several
major pharmaceutical companies to our Sheffield premises to further
investigate our technologies and capabilities. From such discussions
we have signed agreements for both needle-free and the ASI needle-based
autoinjector delivery systems.
Indeed, it is the ASI autoinjector, incorporating drugs packaged
in prefilled syringes, which is undoubtedly attracting most current
interest from potential licensees and partners from the pharmaceutical
and biotechnology industries. The particular attractions of the
ASI relate to:
- A very simple, completely automated injection process
which involves only two user steps.
- The needle is hidden from the patient at all times
- Compatibility with all standard prefilled syringes,
enabling efficient, cost-effective commercialisation on behalf
of pharmaceutical companies
- Consistency of injection, even by those (such as
patients themselves) who possess no specific clinical expertise
- A small number of device components, creating an
inherently reliable and economic system.
Each year, more than one billion doses of drugs are packaged
in prefilled syringes; in extremely competitive pharmaceutical
markets, where companies are looking to create and maintain marketing
advantages, the ASI autoinjector represents a very attractive
proposition.
It has always been my view that large pharmaceutical companies
with blockbuster drugs (i.e. with sales in excess of $1bn) will
always be cautious about partnering these drugs, and their high
sales volumes, with companies which may have limited track records.
This is one reason why the signing of license and supply deals
with Serono and other pharmaceutical companies, along with NHS
Drug Tariff approval for our mhi-500 injector, have been so important
for the development and future prospects of this division. I now
believe we have a demonstrable track record of achievement and
delivery to support our products and I am confident that further
deals will follow for the ASI and other variants of this particular
technology. Additionally, it is worth pointing out that the current
deal for the ASI, and much of the interest from elsewhere is for
a disposable device but that we also have plans for a re-useable
version which may have appeal for injection of insulin and other
drugs.
In summary, our Drug Delivery division continues to make excellent
progress and I anticipate reporting further deals for our devices
in the current year.
Dividend
Our policy of developing and bringing new products to market
remains unchanged and the Board does not therefore recommend a
dividend in the year to 30 June 2005
Colleagues
The progress we continue to make is only possible due to the
key skills and dedication of our staff who continually demonstrate
their commitment to the business. On behalf of the Board I express
sincere thanks to them all.
Current Trading and Prospects
As things currently stand, orthopaedic sales are likely to be
below those achieved in the year just ended and consequently despite
an improving Drug Delivery division I would expect the Group’s
trading performance in the year just started to be below the level
we are currently reporting.
However, with the agreements in place for the Drug Delivery division
progressing to plan, and with growth in the Orthopaedic division
in-line with industry projections, 2006/7 should show a useful
profit.
Ian Townsend
5 October 2005
|